http://wweek.com/editorial/3449/11663/

I'm unsure why WW says I'm not running much of a campaign.  It's true that I do have a regular job, but I have been getting around the state, as I list a plethora of events I've attended or will be attending on my website: http://seth4sos.org/

As far as the other candidates, have they been campaigning full time?  It's hard to say.  Kate's website has been rather empty of updates from since the primary to October, when she came out "in favor" of campaign finance reform -- my major issue.  She doesn't list any substance as far as events.

It's curious that you don't mention my candidacy at all when you reported that sudden change of heart.  Am I not influencing the debate if the newspapers don't publish that the debate happened?

Yes, I'm not employed by large special interest donors, so I can't do the campaign full time, and I'm not a trust fund kid, but when has that ever been a requirement for public office?

Oh, right, it is to Willamette Week -- somebody has to buy political ads from them, the TV stations, and the rest of the media.

Tell you what, Willamette Week.  How would you like to be required to cover all ballot-qualified candidates equally in exchange for use of the public sidewalks for distribution points?

If you live in a democracy, when you abuse your power, you lose it.  The question that remains is whether or not we live in a democracy instead of a plutocracy.  Why don't you editorialize on that?